[Bug 2775] New: Review request: Mplayer2 - An advanced general-purpose video player.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Wed May 1 13:09:06 CEST 2013


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2775

             Bug #: 2775
           Summary: Review request: Mplayer2 - An advanced general-purpose
                    video player.
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: Package Reviews
           Version: Current
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Review Request
        AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
        ReportedBy: kprasad at gmx.com
                CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org


# Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package.
   http://www.freeuploadsite.com/do.php?id=10717

# A short description for the package.
   mplayer2 is an advanced general-purpose video player. A fork of the original
MPlayer project, it contains significant further development and supports a
number of features not available in other Unix players.


# Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
    This package does not meet Fedora's strict license policy. This package
functionality is equivalent to the original Mplayer (mplayer v1).


# The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it. 

$rpmlint mplayer2.spec ../SRPMS/mplayer2-2.0-20130309git.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/mplayer2-*
mplayer2.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20130309git
['2.0-20130309git', '2.0-20130309git']  (I guess this is due to initial
version)
mplayer2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary midentify.sh (There's no doc file
associated with this script in the source)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


# Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package.
    Yes, this is my first package submission.

# Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored
packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. 
      Since I'm not sponsored packager, I need a sponsor.

Thanks,
Prasad

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list