[Bug 3034] New: Review Request: lpf-skype: Skype internet phone client package bootstrap
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri Nov 15 14:55:30 CET 2013
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034
Bug #: 3034
Summary: Review Request: lpf-skype: Skype internet phone client
package bootstrap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: negativo17 at gmail.com
CC: leamas.alec at gmail.com,
rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
spec:
http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-skype/4/lpf-skype.spec
srpm:
http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-skype/4/lpf-skype-4.2.0.11-4.fc20.src.rpm
Bootstrap package allowing the lpf system to build the
non-redistributable skype package.
This cannot go to fedora per fpc decision:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362.
The package has already been reviewed for fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
rpmlint:
lpf-skype.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redistributable ->
redistribute, redistribution, attributable
lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype/state
pkg-build
lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype/state
pkg-build
--> package depends on lpf which creates this user and group
lpf-skype.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/lpf/packages/skype/SOURCES/skype-wrapper 0644L /bin/sh
--> should not be executable
lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype pkg-build
lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype pkg-build
lpf-skype.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype 0775L
--> Needed so that users can access files owned by lpf
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list