mjpegtools update to 2.1.0 was: x264 and ffmpeg - here we go again
Nicolas Chauvet
kwizart at gmail.com
Tue Nov 19 23:10:52 CET 2013
2013/11/19 Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com>
> On Ter, 2013-11-19 at 22:13 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2013/11/19 Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com>
> > On Sáb, 2013-11-09 at 09:07 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Qui, 2013-11-07 at 16:58 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Sáb, 2013-11-02 at 20:01 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > > > > W dniu 02.11.2013 02:52, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> > > > > > On Qui, 2013-10-31 at 07:45 +0100, Julian Sikorski
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> we should definitely do x264 first to save time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK!, x264 built with bootstrap , we can follow, this
> > wiki page
> > > > > > http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists first
> > paragraph
> > > > > > Mass rebuild when bumping SO version of x264 and
> > ffmpeg .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks and best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > ffmpeg build submitted. I will update mplayer later.
> > > >
> > > > Hi, seems to me , ffmpeg doesn't bump so !
> > > >
> > > > may I submit mjpegtools ? to update 2.0.0 to 2.1.0
> > >
> > > OK please rebuild for F20
> > > gstreamer-plugins-bad
> > > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld
> > > transcode
> > > y4mscaler
> > >
> > >
> > > The repoquery for what requires mjpegtools :
> > > repoquery --whatrequires `repoquery --provides mjpegtools\*
> > | grep so |
> > > perl -pe 's/(.*?)-.*/\1*/'` --alldeps --source | sort -u |
> > perl -pe
> > > 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' | grep -v
> > mjpegtools
> > >
> > > I will update wiki
> > http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists
> >
> >
> > Hi, just check mjpegtools-2.1.0 integrate y4mscaler , I just
> > diff the
> > code between mjpegtools-2.1.0 and y4mscaler and they are equal
> > so I
> > think the best solution for bug
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022
> > is Obsoletes: y4mscaler
> > anyone against it ?
> > Nope,
> >
> >
> > Can you make the changes from the mjpegtools side ?
>
> Done , thks
>
> BTw,
You should obsoletes/provide to a given version, and add a note that this
can be dropped from fedora release n+2
Thx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20131119/8e4566cf/attachment.html>
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list