MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 22:53 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken dependency/ffmpeg
> /fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it doesn't already
> exist, you can create a new bug.
> 
> Do not attach SRPM to the bug. Attach a diff -u from the original spec
> to the upgraded spec file. Then the package maintainer can more easily
> review the patch, apply the patch and so forth.
> 
> If this a package that you would like to help maintain going forward,
> and you are already a Fedora packager, you can request to co-maintain
> the package. You would then work with the existing maintainer to
> decide who has time to look at bugs/upgrades etc..

Funny story: I was going to go request co-maintainer status but
apparently, I already am a co-maintainer for mpd. I applied and was
approved in the F16 cycle according to this bug. I just seem to have
completely forgotten about it!

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954

> 
> You mention a successful build. Have you been able to test if the
> build actually runs / works etc ?

Yep. It works for me here:
[asinha at ankur  fedora-packages]$ rpm -q mpd
mpd-0.17.5.89d2d64-1.fc21.x86_64

I'll get in touch with the other maintainers and get this fixed ASAP.
It's a git snapshot that I've packaged, so it's not just a straight
forward update really. 
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20130919/ce6e945e/attachment.sig>