AppData in RPMFusion

Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 18:07:29 CEST 2014


On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 18:27 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> Elad's proposal is about deciding if we want RPMFusion packages to be
> accessible to Desktop Fedora users or not. It's that simple.

Bringing the thread back to topic. Questions that need answering: 

0. Do we want to ship appdata for RPMFusion packages?

If we do:

1. do we start filing bugs with packages that do not currently ship
appdata files asking maintainers to:
a. ship an appdata file
b. send the file upstream for inclusion

2. Who will generate the metadata and where?

3. How will the metadata be packaged to ship in the repositories?

Please see my comment on the tracker bug for more details on the
complete workflow:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2998#c4
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20140814/1f3feb5e/attachment.sig>


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list