[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Dec 2 19:34:01 CET 2014
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
Bug #: 3429
Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads
games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri at civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of
tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive
Fiction".
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3)
Rpmlint:
frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob
frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list