[Bug 3095] New: Review request: netfabb-basic - Freeware suite for STL editing

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3095

             Bug #: 3095
           Summary: Review request: netfabb-basic - Freeware suite for STL
                    editing
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: Package Reviews
           Version: Current
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Review Request
        AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
        ReportedBy: mhroncok at redhat.com
                CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org


SPEC: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/netfabb-basic.spec
SRPM:
http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm

netfabb Basic is a free (as in free beer) software for 3D Printing
and the STL file format. Numerous tools allow all steps of the fabrication
process: editing, repairing, positioning, slicing and exporting triangulated
CAD data. For professional use, the author offers commercial support and
additional modules.

This does obviously not go into Fedora, as it is nonfree. It goes to nonfree
section.



$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm 
netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable

Not quite sure what license to use here, so if this is not OK, just give me the
hint.

netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-url Source1: netfabb-basic_5.0.1_linux64.tar.gz
netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-url Source0: netfabb-basic_5.0.1_linux32.tar.gz

Sources has no public URL, commented in the spec.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.



$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
netfabb-basic.x86_64: W: invalid-license Redistributable

Already addressed.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.