[Bug 3102] Review Request: vdr-softhddevice - A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri Jan 10 17:06:05 CET 2014


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3102

Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Blocks|2                           |3

--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> 2014-01-10 17:06:05 CET ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> 
> > The fedora config file is fine just the user finds it. But generally
> > speaking, she will not do this since she will look in the docs for it.
> > Hence a specific README.fedora is probably needed which just says that
> > the configuration file is added. No blocker.
> 
> "works" as-is.
Obviously, we disagree here. Fine with me.


> > The configuration seems somewhat messy. The Makefile looks for a pkgconfig
> > file, but vdr-devel does not provide this. OTOH vdr-devel does provide
> > a vdr-config binary, but this is not used in the Makefile. Probably worth
> > reporting upstream. If you maintain vdr-devel (?), you could just add a
> > pkgconfig .pc file to it so things are more consistent. Or patch Makefile to
> > use vdr-config. No blocker, it sort of "works" as-is.
> 
> Makefile checks this with /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/vdr.pc  (vdr-devel package)
Yes, sorry, my bad. I missed that vdr-devel actually provided the .pc file


Now, this looks much better. Actually, it looks good. Time to make a review.
Assigning.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list