ffmpeg-2.4 released

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 21:04 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 
> 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com>:
>         On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>         > 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski
>         <belegdol at gmail.com>:
>         >         W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>         >         > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski
>         wrote:
>         >         >> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>         >         >>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian
>         Sikorski wrote:
>         >         >>>> Dear all,
>         >         >>>>
>         >         >>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we
>         have
>         >         another rebuild
>         >         >>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4
>         packages have
>         >         failed, which is
>         >         >>>> not bad given the extent of API changes:
>         >         >>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45:
>         error:
>         >         'struct a52_ctx' has
>         >         >>>> no member named 'frame'
>         >         >>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error:
>         'av_new_stream' was
>         >         not declared
>         >         >>>> in this scope
>         >         >>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error:
>         >         'av_find_stream_info' was
>         >         >>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to
>         be rebuilt
>         >         first)
>         >         >>>>  - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions
>         56 and
>         >         later are not
>         >         >>>> supported yet.
>         >         >>>>
>         >         >>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what
>         would be
>         >         the good time to
>         >         >>>> do the rebuild?
>         >         >>>
>         >         >>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass
>         rebuild of
>         >         others
>         >         >>> packages, no problem.
>         >         >>>
>         >         >>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ?
>         I'd like
>         >         put it at
>         >         >>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of
>         the
>         >         packages, with
>         >         >>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on
>         >         update-testing for more
>         >         >>> time than usual, but is not my decision .
>         >         >>>
>         >         >>>
>         >         >>> Best regards,
>         >         >>>
>         >         >> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care
>         of
>         >         rebuilding mplayer.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Can we care about rebuilding all dependencies at the same
>         time ?
>         >
>         
>         yes of course , I will take care ,
>         
>         but may I build all for new ffmpeg /x624 for F20 ? 
>         
>         
>         
> SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was done
> in Rawhide.
> I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have
> coordinated the update.

Sorry I'm in work and can't focus, I already sent incomplete emails etc,
but you NACK because ffmpeg 2.4 was submit in devel ? we can roll back
it , it easy to roll back it. 

I understand, how things should roll out , first commit in devel , and
copy along branches and that is the way that should be done . So yes it
was forbidden commit on devel for not roll out to branch , am I the
coordinator ? , we can fix it, is not a big deal. I will take care of
everything 
Thanks, 

I have to go now ,

Best regards, 


> PERIOD.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.