[Bug 3600] New: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Apr 19 23:36:17 CEST 2015
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600
Bug #: 3600
Summary: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: holcapek at gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
- spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/master/ubuntu-fonts.spec
- src rpm:
https://github.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/raw/master/ubuntu-fonts-0.80-1.fc21.src.rpm
- description:
The Ubuntu Font Family are a set of matching new libre/open fonts.
The development is being funded by Canonical on behalf the wider
Free Software community and the Ubuntu project. The technical font
design work and implementation is being undertaken by Dalton Maag.
- why not in Fedora:
Ubuntu Font License is considered non-free:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642#c4
- rpmlint on src rpm:
ubuntu-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib
re, lib-re
> %description is exactly what can be found at http://font.ubuntu.com/about/
ubuntu-fonts.src: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License
> the reason I'd like to see the package in rpmfusion
ubuntu-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section
> there's nothing to build, thus no %build secion
- rpmlint on binary rpm:
ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib
re, lib-re
ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License
- this is my first rpmfusion package
- I am already a Fedora package maintainer:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/holcapek/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list