libraries missing on F22 and higher

[Antonio Trande]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/27/2015 12:26 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote:
>>> On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande 
>>>>> <anto.trande at gmail.com <mailto:anto.trande at gmail.com>>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet
>>>>> on Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild 
>>>>> (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as
>>>>> soon as possible:
>>>>> 
>>>>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> All of them are actually available, please double check
>>>>> your system.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>> 
>>>> are available as fc23 packages?
>>> 
>>> no , they are available as fc22 in F23
>>> 
>> 
>> Honestly, I don't understand how we can tolerate something like
>> that, that is using on Fedora 23 some packages built on Fedora
>> 22; is there not any dependency issue?
> 
> No. RPM doesn't care about disttag for dependencies unless you
> actually specify a dependency using it, e.g.: Requires: foo =
> 1.1-2.fc23
> 
> As long as SONAMEs match (or actually, as long as Provides: match),
> the dependencies are satisfied. There's nothing wrong with having
> .fc22 packages in F23+ repos.
> 

In 'faad2' case or some other case, yes for now.
How do you know if a .fc22 package works fine on Fedora 23 if you
don't rebuild?

Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? Are you
sure that in the meantime a package don't need any other changes like
License packaging, dependency between sub-packages, or any minor fixes?

Regards.

- -- 
Antonio Trande

mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWfydSAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8/NQIAKrVRStGTdPm4xgWtpFp5C5w
eFtbhUnRqBnQ+oxEotuGFt1oyoqa5BYHWaoJ5XdY21hXFfP6v2H9BywTV3MN/07B
itdx95emAvm9m5cNfi/Ft10qu00n1Ygm9h9w5dPsZvCSrnsNhL4sA+h9FTkqpR5E
hHW5aLsPbjSqMEoLi+1H+g65JRWzEdknTAKB6pUpY1UIQEzF+as8VvHyJL/LlN1K
0If8cy96R0ksPGsBZPY/+P5MB/4Mk4sQSywVXLO13zhClmY86QHwMFFozoACfe/4
MY7jfdZk5QptKWJFwJp5S/ukAWdB4TeIwvquCe66VAjpRsp2j6quBHcr0BKK2ak=
=KrN/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----