problem with branches/version tags
Sérgio Basto
sergio at serjux.com
Thu Jun 25 14:38:29 CEST 2015
On Qui, 2015-06-25 at 11:38 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the information -
>
> > For exceptions as freetype-freeworld of Kevin, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > "Kevin has received an access to a preview git repository.
> > freetype-freeworld needs to match the fedora counterpart. Others
> > packagers in the same situation can request such override."
>
> I've noticed this but for some reason I thought this applies just to stable
> branches, i.e. to the second part of my problem, and that RPMFusion devel
> still follows Rawhide, after the F22 repo was spun off it using the new
> Koji instance
AFAIK RPMFusion don't have packages for rawhide since branch of F22 .
> now to the second part, matching the versions in stable branches, well,
> that discussion started in April, so I was hoping the process got improved
> or documented meanwhile ... and if "can request" still applies - does that
> mean via bugzilla, or sending private e-mail to kwizart, or ...?
Private e-mail to kwizart
> there are some bugs related to the move to the new infrastructure but these
> are mostly some FTBFS problems ... did I give up going through them too
> early, before discovering information I need?
We should try to fix FTBFS in CVS devel (F21), what FTBFS and bugs are
you talking about ? Bugzilla is the same as ever
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list