problem with branches/version tags

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Thu Jun 25 14:38:29 CEST 2015


On Qui, 2015-06-25 at 11:38 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the information -
> 
> > For exceptions as freetype-freeworld of Kevin, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 
> > "Kevin has received an access to a preview git repository.
> > freetype-freeworld needs to match the fedora counterpart. Others
> > packagers in the same situation can request such override."
> 
> I've noticed this but for some reason I thought this applies just to stable 
> branches, i.e. to the second part of my problem, and that RPMFusion devel 
> still follows Rawhide, after the F22 repo was spun off it using the new 
> Koji instance

AFAIK RPMFusion don't have packages for rawhide since branch of F22 .

> now to the second part, matching the versions in stable branches, well, 
> that discussion started in April, so I was hoping the process got improved 
> or documented meanwhile ... and if "can request" still applies - does that 
> mean via bugzilla, or sending private e-mail to kwizart, or ...?

Private e-mail to kwizart

> there are some bugs related to the move to the new infrastructure but these 
> are mostly some FTBFS problems ... did I give up going through them too 
> early, before discovering information I need?

We should try to fix FTBFS in CVS devel (F21), what FTBFS and bugs are
you talking about ? Bugzilla is the same as ever

Best regards, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list