[Bug 3554] Review request: aqualung - Music Player for GNU/Linux
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Mar 1 18:03:30 CET 2015
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #6 from MartinKG <mgansser at alice.de> 2015-03-01 18:03:30 CET ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Program itself seems to be working correctly.
>
> * License
> - Well, please never modify license text downstream, even
> if rpmlint complains for it.
> License modification must be done only on upstream.
reported upstream
>
> * BuildRequires:
> - For pkgconfig based BR (i.e. "PKG_CHECK_MODULES" in configure.ac)
> it is better to use pkgconfig vitual BR, like
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(flac) (not a blocker)
Done
>
> * License tag
> - (not a blocker) License tag can simply be GPLv2+
> (This is effectively one single binary, and writing multiple
> licenses where GPLv2+ is predominant actually does not make
> sense)
>
Done
> * License file
> - Use %license for license text:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
>
Done
> * %defattr
> - %defattr can be removed (current rpmbuild does not need this
> any longer)
>
Done
> * rpmfusion category
> - Well, I think this is "free" category for rpmfusion, not "nonfree"
> > This package needs to link the following nonfree
> > libraries, so this package is nonfree.
> My recognition is that they are actually "free" (patent issue
> or so does not make it "nonfree" category), would you check
> this? (Also check MOCK.log attached)
>
> * incorrect-fsf-address rpmlint
> - Please ping upsteam later (check rpmlint result for -debuginfo rpm)
> (not a blocker)
>
report this later
> Well, please check above. I don't see strict blocker for this package.
Done
new SPE/SRPM file:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/aqualung.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/aqualung-0.9-0.7.svn1309.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Mar 01 2015 Martin Gansser <martinkg at fedoraproject.org> - 0.9-0.7.svn1309
- added link to upstream patch %%{name}-fsf-fix.patch
- corrected lincese tag
- Mark license files as %%license where available
- dropped %%defattr does not need any longer
- dropped macro %%{buildroot}
- take ownership of unowned directory %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/
- added pkgconfig based BR
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list