port of game-data-packager to Fedora
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 12:44:36 CET 2015
Hi,
On 03-11-15 16:17, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 02:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> lgogdownloader is more interesting. Which also makes me wonder about
>> game-data-packager itself. I really do not see any reason for them not to
>> be in Fedora proper, but I must admit it sort of a gray area.
>>
>> I think you may want to mail Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>
>> about how acceptable both of them are for Fedora. He is the go to
>> persons for questions like these, and any answer he gives is the
>> definitive answer.
>
> I'm actually going to defer to FESCo on this, since legally, there is no
> issue with either.
Ok,
Alexandre, that means that I'm afraid you will get an early introduction
to some of the red tape processes in Fedora.
Can you please file a ticket with FESCo to discuss the suitability of
both lgogdownloader and game-data-packager.
You will need a Fedora account (you will need one anyways to package
some of the game-data-packager deps):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/new
And then file a ticket here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/
Thanks,
Hans
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list