What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 08-11-15 16:34, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>           There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
>>>>>           wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
>>>>>           ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
>>>>>           for rebuild next week.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
>>>>> which packages still need to be rebuilt?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
>>>>>           latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
>>>>>           audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
>>>>>           contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
>>>>>           repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
>>>>>
>>>>>           Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
>>>>>
>>>> I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
>>>> I'll try send the list this afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
>>>> enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
>>>> system .
>>>
>>> 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
>>> repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt
>>>
>>> 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need to rebuild:
>>> cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr
>>>
>>> 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
>>> cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u
>>> after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got the list in attachment
>>>
>>> 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
>>> cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
>>> Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
>>> releases packages
>>
>> Sergio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Sergio's original mail) but I do not
>> think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild packages
>> which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not rebuild
>> all packages which have not been rebuild yet.
>
> Thanks but I thought that is to follow Fedora and it was all packages
> [1], I ask that at the time.
>
> Anyway, Nicolas mention an provenpackager, I don't mind take care of the
> mass rebuild , just need some instructions and the OK from Nicolas.
>
> Another topic, that I not take care, is the packages that need matching
> their fedora counterpart , can someone list it ? , are they only all
> freeworld packages ? or we have exceptions ?

I think that *freeworld is a good start, I do not know any exceptions from
the top of my head. If anyone knows of any exceptions please speak-up now.

Regards,

Hans