[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Nov 9 21:07:32 CET 2015
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
--- Comment #12 from Richard <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2015-11-09 21:07:32 CET ---
I can take the review once the SRPM is updated to the latest version.
Some feedback on the spec file:
1. The project URL tag should probably be:
http://www.libde265.org/
2. Is renaming the executables necessary? Do they conflict with another
package?
3. While the binaries are examples, if they're useful enough, why put them in a
-examples subpackage?
Along the same lines, should libde265 provide packages similar in structure to
x264/x265?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list