[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Nov 9 21:07:32 CET 2015


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335

--- Comment #12 from Richard <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2015-11-09 21:07:32 CET ---
I can take the review once the SRPM is updated to the latest version.

Some feedback on the spec file:

1. The project URL tag should probably be:

http://www.libde265.org/

2. Is renaming the executables necessary? Do they conflict with another
package?

3. While the binaries are examples, if they're useful enough, why put them in a
-examples subpackage?

Along the same lines, should libde265 provide packages similar in structure to
x264/x265?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list