What is missing for f23 readyness ?
Nicolas Chauvet
kwizart at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 23:12:37 CET 2015
2015-11-07 15:12 GMT+01:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
>> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If
>> someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week.
>>
>
> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> which packages still need to be rebuilt?
>
>
>
>> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest upstream
>> or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, audacity-freeworld, etc). I
>> would like to have maintainers contact provenpackager (that have access to
>> the git preview repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
>> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
>>
>
> I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but it
> requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream hid
> them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but haven't gotten
> a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but it has gotten
> *ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which my $DAYJOB
> unknowingly sponsored.
>
Okay so it means sox*-freeworld will need to be discarded from the RPM
Fusion "GA" repository and will be made available as a regular update.
Can you properly track this request to a bugzilla blocking # f23 blocker
bugs.
For the info, having to read all singles messages for off-topic issue is
really exhausting.
Can't you just report a bug and block #3799
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3799>
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20151109/5dae5362/attachment.html>
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list