[Bug 3827] Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Wed Nov 11 12:24:35 CET 2015
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com> 2015-11-11 12:24:35 CET ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> We need to package rfpkg in order to migrate our epel5 support for the new
> infra. But I would say we can drop support for EL5 given the lack of updates.
EPEL7?
Is it planned?
>
> I was able to clone, both as authenticated (git preview) and anononymous (from
> github). So that's okay.
>
>
> rfpkg-free and rfpkg-nonfree should probably be made. We will know and pass
> the tree (free/nonfree) in severals rpkg methods (upload/koji build
> submission/).
> I would say have the section passed-in the script file (aka rfpkg -C
> /etc/rpkg/rfpkg-free.conf -t free "$@")
>
So come back to initial packages
rfpkg
rfpkg-free (config-file for Free)
rfpkg-nonfree (config-file for nonFree)
>
> Nothing should be missing in order to use the current upload mechanism, but we
> will need to pass the section in upload. I might need to change the server side
> certificate.
>
> FYI, I've spent time to extract the curl line to currently used to upload:
> upload-file = curl -k --cert ~/.rpmfusion.cert --fail --silent -F "tree=free"
> -F "name=xmltv" -F "md5sum=7f95c24f91a7ac48cf81c32b21dc0492" -F
> "file=@xmltv-0.5.67.tar.bz2" https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi
>
> So the upload method probably needs to be overriden from rpkg to do that.
>
>
> Last it would be nice to see what can be backported from fedpkg 1.21 to rfpkg
I'm waiting a reply from fedpkg maintainer about the bash-completion issue.
>
> @Antonio, if you can handle some of theses actions, it would be nice. None of
> them (exept for the server side certificate for cvs.rpmfusion.org) requires any
> access from the infra.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list