rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Fri Oct 23 13:57:20 CEST 2015


Hello mates 

On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>:
>         Hi All,
>         
>         I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
>         for Fedora-23:
>         
>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>         
>         But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
>         are the
>         plans here ?
> Sorry for the lake for answear,
> 
> 
> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> 
> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> 
> 
> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> 
As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
like try do it in oneshot ... 

Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
yesterday for F23 .

I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . 


[1]
http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists 

[2]
https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee
> 

> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list