rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?
Sérgio Basto
sergio at serjux.com
Fri Oct 23 13:57:20 CEST 2015
Hello mates
On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
> for Fedora-23:
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>
> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
> are the
> plans here ?
> Sorry for the lake for answear,
>
>
> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
>
> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
>
>
> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
>
As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
like try do it in oneshot ...
Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
yesterday for F23 .
I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump .
[1]
http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists
[2]
https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee
>
>
--
Sérgio M. B.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list