Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 12:43 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> On 28-06-16 03:52, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > Hello !
> > 
> > On Seg, 2016-06-27 at 20:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting
> > > the
> > > f24
> > > repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are
> > > there.
> > > 
> > > I accidentally found out that some not so important pkgs are
> > > missing
> > > though when running dnf repoquery --extras on my main workstation
> > > which has way too much stuff installed :)
> > > 
> > > Doing this gives the following (incomplete list):
> > > 
> > > -For f24 free:
> > >    -SheepShaver
> > >    -vbam
> > >    -madplay
> > >    -mock-rpmfusion-free
> > >    -wormsofprey
> > >    -xmris
> > >    -zsnes
> > > 
> > > -For f24 nonfree:
> > >    -d1x
> > >    -doom-shareware
> > >    -unrar
> > >    -mac
> > >    -mock-rpmfusion-nonfree
> > >    -roadfighter
> > >    -smc-music
> > >    -spear-demo
> > >    -vice
> > >    -wolf4sdl
> > >    -xv
> > > 
> > > All of these do have builds for older Fedora releases in the new
> > > koji, so the easiest fix likely is to simple tag these as
> > > f24-free-updates / f24-nonfree-updates .
> > > 
> > Yes, we have to review this , I also have a list ( of dnf list
> > extras )
> > ...
> > 
> > > 
> > > There seem to be 2 underlying problems:
> > > 
> > > 1) The f24 repo did not inherit any builds from previous releases
> > > (assuming we want to keep the base f24 pkg set frozen we cannot
> > > fix
> > >   this now)
> > > 
> > > 2) Some pkgs never got rebuild for f24, I've not checked all of
> > > the
> > > above, but for those which I've checked there are no failed f24
> > > builds,
> > > they were likely simply never rebuild.
> > > 
> > > As said for starters I think we should tag these into f24-free-
> > > updates /
> > > f24-nonfree-updates. Quite a few of the above (incomplete!) list
> > > are
> > > mine, so I will prepare f24 builds for them.
> > > 
> > > I've already prepared and pushed a vice update for this, but
> > > rfpkg new-sources is failing for me, and as is already known
> > > rfpkg build does not work yet.
> > At least at free repo , I got some reports  that is working ,
> > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free/?C=M;O=D
> Well it does not work for me, can you try to rfpkg clone nonfree/vice
> and then spectool -g *.spec, verify the downloaded sources match
> the md5 in the sources file, and do rfpkg new-sources (note there
> are 4 sources in the sources file) and see if this works for you ?

http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=704
I had install rfpkg-1.23.2-1.fc24.noarch in my F23 

It is working in free repo , could you try add --nonfree , should set
rpkg namespace with nonfree , although I think it is an hack . 

> Related to this, downloading from the lookaside-cache does not work
> either, e.g. for vice rfpkg srpm fails with the first source, which
> is already in the look-a-side.
> 
> If you do get this work can you please let me know:
> 
> 1) which version of rfpkg you're using exactly
> 2) what cmdline you're using
> 3) if you've any local config tweaks ?
> 
> > 
> > ignatenkobrain ask to update mpg123 the source is already uploaded
> > !?!
> > this is what ignatenkobrain propose https://github.com/ascot-repo/m
> > pg12
> > 3/blob/master/mpg123.spec
> > 
> > in attach what I propose
> esound is obsolete, Fedora has actively been working on removing it,
> so we should not re-introduce deps on it, from the mpg123.spec
> changelog:
> 
> - Drop obsolete esound and arts plugins from mpg123-plugins-extras

ok  , I learned that today 

>  > , I lost my chat log with him ... in resume,
> > 
> > he removed  /sbin/alternatives since claims that we haven't any
> > other
> > alternative and also remove other spec snippets , I don't know the
> > impact of that, so I leave that to maintainers ( you :D ) .
> wrt alternatives, we had mpg321 in the past not sure if we still do,
> wrt the rebase to a newer version this is being tracked here:
> 
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087
> 
> I've also left a comment there explaining why I'm in no hurry to do
> the rebase (it contains a bunch of major changes).

ok , looks good to me. 

> Regards,
> 
> Hans
-- 
Sérgio M. B.