Package assignment
Sérgio Basto
sergio at serjux.com
Tue Mar 1 19:34:31 CET 2016
On Ter, 2016-03-01 at 18:57 +0100, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Sérgio Basto:
> >
> > Well bugzilla have good tools to search and you can save the
> > searches.
> Sure, but if possible I prefer to get an interrupt when things
> happen,
> rather than having to poll. :-)
>
> >
> > Last but not least, do you approve the update (as the maintainer of
> > the
> > package) ?
> > https://github.com/rpmfusion/mythtv-status/commit/b51e05c76bcb2ad82
> > e3c0
> > 787d5bc4d53a931d674
> Reading a patch of a patch was an interesting experience. :-)
you may read final result :
https://github.com/rpmfusion/mythtv-status/blob/master/mythtv-status.spec
> Overall, it looks fine. I have two comments:
>
> 1. The comment "Add mythtv status to end of stub" in
> mythtv-update-motd that previously existed in the patch could have
> been left in. No big deal, though.
>
> 2. Why is it necessary to throw away standard error of the
> mythtv-status command in mythtv-update-motd? It isn't new in this
> version, but the line is modified so I noted. (Maybe that is more a
> question for Susi Lehtola. Cc:ing explicitly in case no longer a
> subscriber.)
Can you fork git at github.com:rpmfusion/mythtv-status.git and do a pull
request? please.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list