Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?
Julian Sikorski
belegdol at gmail.com
Sat Nov 5 15:52:04 CET 2016
W dniu 12.10.2016 o 16:15, Kevin Kofler pisze:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained
>> AFAIK. We can't push out a big rebuild of a major library so one, new
>> package can be introduced into F24.
>
> Huh? Upstream says 3.1 is API- and ABI-compatible to 3.0 (with only one
> application needed fixing for some reason),
Could you please point me to a reference for this? I looked around a bit
but couldn't find one. Thanks!
so it should be perfectly
> suitable as an update. This is similar to Qt upgrades that have often been
> done in Fedora (where there are also a few odd packages that invariably need
> rebuilding due to (ab)using private Qt APIs).
>
> Introducing a second package for the new version is a horrible idea, it will
> lead to symbol conflicts (in applications accidentally transitively linking
> both versions) and a waste of space. I would just upgrade the existing
> package to the new version.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list