F25 rpmfusion repos
Sérgio Basto
sergio at serjux.com
Wed Oct 19 19:32:58 CEST 2016
On Ter, 2016-10-18 at 19:12 +0000, Vascom wrote:
> In fedora I am always build release for all supported versions (for
> example f23, f24, f25, rawhide now) if it possible. And can solve
> build problems on early development stage.
> It help find roblems not only in my package but in all BuildRequires.
> Also package builded with latest available BR versions that may have
> solve some warnings or has new features.
> I am think it is good for most packages.
I understand you perfectly , I also advocate package rebuilds, but here
in RPMFusion , for now, we also try to save maximum infra work. So we
just follow Fedora rules , which in F25 we don't had any mass rebuild.
In F25 we got 7685 packages with f24 or lower disttag.
dnf repoquery --releasever=25 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=fedora --
repoid=fedora --qf "%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}" | grep -vP "fc25" | wc -l
> вт, 18 окт. 2016 г., 22:05 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>:
> > 2016-10-18 21:03 GMT+02:00 Vascom <vascom2 at gmail.com>:
> > >> F25 don't had one mass rebuild , so it is normal have fc24
> > suffixes in
> > >> f25 and rawhide (f26)
> > >
> > > Why not build same version with fresh gcc and other devel
> > package?
> > You can have the same question in fedora, you will have a
> > equivalent
> > answer as us.
> >
> > Thx
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> >
--
Sérgio M. B.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list