<p>Yesterday. <br>
Le 27 oct. 2012 10:43, "Julian Sikorski" <<a href="mailto:belegdol@gmail.com">belegdol@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
><br>
> W dniu 11.10.2012 07:28, Julian Sikorski pisze:<br>
> > W dniu 11.10.2012 00:27, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:<br>
> >> 2012/10/10 Julian Sikorski <<a href="mailto:belegdol-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org">belegdol-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org</a>>:<br>
> >>> W dniu 2012-10-10 12:22, Leigh Scott pisze:<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Hi Julian,<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>>> If I could somehow force only one build at a<br>
> >>>>> time, this could help. Otherwise we might need to bump the builder<br>
> >>>>> memory - how much does it have now?<br>
> >> That's the point, the builder is lacking memory, but only during link<br>
> >> time of a given build.<br>
> >> I've reproduced the problem on a similar builder. I will try to<br>
> >> reproduce using a f18 target.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Please do not submit any mame jobs for now.<br>
> >> Thx<br>
> >><br>
> >> Nicolas (kwizart)<br>
> >><br>
> > Sure, no problem. If the memory is the only issue, I can consider<br>
> > donating some. Let me know what your tests show and what type of memory<br>
> > is needed.<br>
> ><br>
> > Julian<br>
> ><br>
> Where do we stand on this? If RPM Fusion is no longer able to supply<br>
> up-to-date mame packages, I need to look for another solution.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Julian</p>
<p>Hi Julian,</p>
<p>I was only able to test a f18 target<br>
Yesterday. And it has failed the same as f19.</p>
<p>There are actions ongoing to solve this from the infra side.</p>
<p>Btw. Is there a way to lower the memory usage needed at link time until the problem is solved ?</p>
<p>Nicolas ( kwizart)</p>