<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/5/9 Ankur Sinha <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sanjay.ankur@gmail.com" target="_blank">sanjay.ankur@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Hans, Alec,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:<br>
> Note that we would prefer for opencv-nonfree to just contain a couple<br>
> of plugins, or some such, and depend on the Fedora package. If that is<br>
> not possible it is allowed to simply copy the Fedora package as base,<br>
> add the nonfree bits and make it Conflict with the original, see for<br>
> example audacity-nonfree<br>
<br>
</div>I'll try making a package that only provides the non free bits. I'm<br>
already a fedora package maintainer. I'll get on it asap.<br></blockquote><br></div>Hi,<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Please note that despite the shared object is named opencv_nonfree.so, this library will belong to the RPM Fusion free section.<br>
We used to use the opencv-freeworld as the package name in this case. (instead of opencv-free).<br><br>It's also possible to package the opencv_video.so, which last depends on a cuda compiler. It could be named opencv-nonfree as it will depends on proprietary software (the nvidia cuda compiler).<br>
<br><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Nicolas (kwizart)<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br></div></div>