<div dir="ltr">On 1 November 2013 02:42, Kevin Kofler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at" target="_blank">kevin.kofler@chello.at</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
> I'm going to complain about this to FPC, and if they ignore the issue,<br>
> escalate it to FESCo. This kind of package has no business being in<br>
> Fedora!<br>
<br>
</div><a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362" target="_blank">https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Apparently for the legal team this is acceptable. As I already stated before I'm very surprised that it has passed legal review; but if it's acceptable for them...<br>
<br>I would feel more comfortable though if these packages would go in RPMFusion instead of Fedora. This way Fedora would promote only 100% free software and all reviews would not have the FE-LEGAL burden.<br><br></div><div>
Just my 2c.<br><br></div><div>--Simone<br clear="all"></div></div><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).<br><br><a href="http://xkcd.com/229/" target="_blank">http://xkcd.com/229/</a><br>
<a href="http://negativo17.org/" target="_blank">http://negativo17.org/</a><br></div>
</div></div>