<p dir="ltr"><br>
Le 18 nov. 2013 21:52, "Sérgio Basto" <<a href="mailto:sergio@serjux.com">sergio@serjux.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
><br>
> On Seg, 2013-11-18 at 21:36 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:<br>
> > On 2013-11-18 20:29, Sérgio Basto wrote:<br>
> > > On Sex, 2013-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:<br>
> > >> I wrote:<br>
> > >>> And if FPC doesn't feel competent, they should say so so we can re-file<br>
> > >>> the ticket with FESCo (or they could just forward it to FESCo directly).<br>
> > >> Actually, I see FPC made a decision now, that's good.<br>
> > > And what was decision ? , I don't understand what is write in the<br>
> > > ticket .<br>
> > ><br>
> > It basically boils down to that the main lpf package is OK for fedora,<br>
> > while lpf-* packages as lpf-skype and lpf-spotify-client should be in a<br>
> > 'more appropriate repository' (Don't mention the war...)<br>
> ><br>
> > I have retired lpf-spotify-client from fedora. lpf-skype and<br>
> > lpf-spotify-client are on their way into rpmfusion in tickets 3033 and<br>
> > 3034 in a joint venture between me and Simone Caronni.<br>
><br>
> I will join in with "Adobe flash reader", it is possible ?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Is it possible to only handle the adobe-release* repositories instead ? Unless all thoses adobe packages are really broken ?<br><br><br></p>
<p dir="ltr">Nicolas (kwizart)<br></p>