<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">On 26 November 2013 00:08, Sérgio Basto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sergio@serjux.com" target="_blank">sergio@serjux.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Apart of this. RPMFusion have any other rule or restriction ? to not<br>
ship this kind of software ? , because already have a repo ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I've read the license text file and it seems that we can do what lpf package does, i.e. the user downloads and installs the package on its own system; so it should be coevered by the license.<br>
</div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
My idea was exactly not have to configure a dozen repositories, and<br>
eventually an rpmfusion remix have it all out of the box .<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Would like to as well. It's not like having the package downloaded through a yum repository, but it's better than nothing. <br>
<br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>--Simone<br><br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).<br><br><a href="http://xkcd.com/229/" target="_blank">http://xkcd.com/229/</a><br>
<a href="http://negativo17.org/" target="_blank">http://negativo17.org/</a><br></div>
</div></div>