<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 December 2013 17:28, Nicolas Chauvet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kwizart@gmail.com" target="_blank">kwizart@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Try to work the patches on a per feature basis ( look at the existing bug reports if available)<br></p></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">This is what I'm planning to do, but my question was if there is any interest on separate nvidia-settings, nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-persistenced or not.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"></div><div class="gmail_extra">The only bug I found about using binaries was the following, referenced in the xorg-x11-drv-nvidia changelog:<br><br><a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852</a><br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Reverting to the binary seems just a quick fix for decreasing maintenance burden.<br><br>I would like to know if I can follow the road for the separate nvidia
packages before seeing 3 reviews and patches closed for nothing, as it is quite time consuming and my time is really limited.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">--Simone<br><br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).<br><br><a href="http://xkcd.com/229/" target="_blank">http://xkcd.com/229/</a><br>
<a href="http://negativo17.org/" target="_blank">http://negativo17.org/</a><br></div>
</div></div>