<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Martin Gansser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linux4martin@web.de" target="_blank">linux4martin@web.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">During the review process for openclonk[1] it was discovered that it had<br>
a bundled copy of sort.h. It's unusual as it is not designed to be<br>
built into a stand alone library, static or shared. In fact it does<br>
not contain a make file.<br>
<br>
- It's not already packaged in Fedora or RPM Fusion<br>
- It's a header only library (essentially a copylib)<br>
<br>
If the consensus is to allow the exception, my plan is to do the following:<br>
- add a virtual provides for tracking purposes:<br>
Provides: bundled(timsort)<br>
- Add a "Provides: bundled(timsort)" with version per the Fedora guidelines.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1 from me.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Richard </div></div></div></div>