<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div>2015-05-22 16:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sergio@serjux.com" target="_blank">sergio@serjux.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi, Kelvin,<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Ter, 2015-05-19 at 01:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:<br>
> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:<br>
> > I've headed a mass rebuid on my own koji instance for f22-free and it's<br>
> > nearing completion.<br>
><br>
> Unfortunately, a mass rebuild of the current CVS contents without separate<br>
> branches for F21 and F22 does not help me at all for freetype-freeworld. I<br>
> absolutely NEED a separate F21 branch to be able to do any work on the F22<br>
> version. The package ought to track the version of Freetype in Fedora. I<br>
> cannot do this with one devel branch for 3 (!) different releases (F21, F22,<br>
> Rawhide/F23).<br>
><br>
> Why can we not have CVS branches for F21 and F22?<br>
<br>
</div></div>Your question was already answered. "This is not a high priority, you<br></blockquote><div> </div><div>Can you please avoid doing such assumption! Kevin has received an access to a preview git repository. freetype-freeworld needs to match the fedora counterpart. Others packagers in the same situation can request such override. So this is very different than VirtualBox 5.0 which will have to wait.<br><br></div><div>I really do not appreciate your attempt to hijack the migration process, please delete this github repository.<br></div><div>If you help with the infra, please at least take one action and stop re-doing something that was done properly by me already.<br></div><div><a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023</a><br><br></div><div>thx for you understanding.<br><br></div><div>Nicolas<br></div><div><br><br><br></div></div></div></div>