<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2015-10-25 21:12 GMT+01:00 Julian Sikorski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:belegdol@gmail.com" target="_blank">belegdol@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">W dniu 23.10.2015 o 13:57, Sérgio Basto pisze:<br>
<div><div class="h5">> Hello mates<br>
><br>
> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:<br>
>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <<a href="mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com">j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> Hi All,<br>
>><br>
>> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x<br>
>> for Fedora-23:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794</a><br>
>> <a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795</a><br>
>> <a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796</a><br>
>><br>
>> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What<br>
>> are the<br>
>> plans here ?<br>
>> Sorry for the lake for answear,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time<br>
>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.<br>
>><br>
>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,<br>
>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages<br>
>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23<br>
>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from<br>
>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)<br>
>><br>
> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with<br>
> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd<br>
> like try do it in oneshot ...<br>
><br>
> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148<br>
> yesterday for F23 .<br>
><br>
> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had<br>
> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,<br>
> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination<br>
> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest<br>
> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump .<br>
><br>
><br>
> [1]<br>
> <a href="http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists</a><br>
><br>
> [2]<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
>><br>
><br>
</div></div>I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted<br>
already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is<br>
not completely populated yet.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div>xvidcore and x265 are failing. <br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>-<br><br></div>Nicolas (kwizart)<br></div></div>
</div></div>