<div dir="ltr">The answer of deadbeef author in english:<div><br></div><div>"I do not change copyright in libraries. let the upstream do changes. When I will update the version of libraries - and then renew their copyrights."<br></div><div><br></div><div>So he don't apply any patch to correct copyright.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">вт, 16 авг. 2016 г. в 12:55, Alec Leamas <<a href="mailto:leamas.alec@gmail.com">leamas.alec@gmail.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On 16/08/16 11:28, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:<br>
> Do you mean report FSF address issue not to deadbeef upstream but to<br>
> libs/plugins upstream?<br>
> I am report this to deadbeef author and he don't want correct this.<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/Alexey-Yakovenko/deadbeef/issues/901" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/Alexey-Yakovenko/deadbeef/issues/901</a><br>
><br>
> As described here<br>
> <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address</a> I<br>
> can correct this files.<br>
<br>
Well, my Russian isn't what it should be. That said, to change all<br>
those addresses is a lot of work, and I can understand upstream if they<br>
refuse for that reason. I certainly would if I were not also a packager.<br>
<br>
I have a simple script which I use now and then to prepare a patch.<br>
Sending the same issue as a pull request might be better, at least<br>
sometimes. Script is at <a href="http://paste.fedoraproject.org/409122/14713410" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://paste.fedoraproject.org/409122/14713410</a>.<br>
Of course, the output must be reviewed and cleaned up, but it usually<br>
saves a lot of work<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers!<br>
<br>
--alec<br>
</blockquote></div>