<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/" />
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Review request: ffms2 - cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg/libav"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255">4255</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>Review request: ffms2 - cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg/libav
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>Package Reviews
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>Current
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>x86_64
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>URL</th>
<td>https://github.com/FFMS/ffms2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>GNU/Linux
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>Review Request
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>rebus@seznam.cz
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Blocks</th>
<td>2
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>SPEC: <a href="https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPEC/ffms2.spec">https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPEC/ffms2.spec</a>
SRPM: <a href="https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.src.rpm">https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.src.rpm</a>
Description:
FFmpegSource (usually known as FFMS or FFMS2) is a cross-platform wrapper
library around FFmpeg/libav. It gives you an easy, convenient way to say
"open and decompress this media file for me, I don't care how you do it"
and get frame- and sample-accurate access (usually), without having to bother
with the sometimes less than straightforward and less than perfectly documented
libav API.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
it compiles with ffmpeg. It is needed to package the aegisub.
$ rpmlint ffms2.spec ../SRPMS/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-devel-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-debuginfo-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
ffms2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya
ffms2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libav -> lib av, lib-av,
Libya
ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya
ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libav -> lib av, lib-av,
Libya
ffms2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffmsindex
ffms2-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Bogus errors - mostly spelling errors and having devel files in /usr/lib64.
I am Fedora packager already.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>