<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286">bug 4286</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at" title="Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@chello.at>"> <span class="fn">Kevin Kofler</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Please install PepperFlash into one of these locations:
<a href="http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.cpp#n170">http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.cpp#n170</a>
and Widevine (which I think should really be a separate SRPM) into one of these
locations:
<a href="http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.cpp#n229">http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.cpp#n229</a>
Otherwise, QtWebEngine will not find it.
Unfortunately, the PepperFlash paths hardcode /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 and do
not contain one path that is the same except for the libsuffix. (I think the
assumption there is that people will only use the 64-bit version. The /usr/lib
paths are intended for non-multilib distros.) So you would have to use
completely different paths for the 32-bit and 64-bit plugin, or we will have to
patch QtWebEngine.
Your package is also missing:
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>