<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286">bug 4286</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:kvolny@redhat.com" title="Karel Volný <kvolny@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Karel Volný</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Kevin Kofler from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=4286#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Please install PepperFlash into one of these locations:
> <a href="http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt">http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt</a>.
> cpp#n170
> and Widevine (which I think should really be a separate SRPM) into one of
> these locations:
> <a href="http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt">http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt</a>.
> cpp#n229
>
> Otherwise, QtWebEngine will not find it.</span >
not the best place to discuss this, but ... do I read the code correctly that
it does not include reading the path from configfile?
hardcoding the paths to .cpp seems to me the worst possible practice ... WTH
there is no make option for that at least, so distro-specific stuff can be
defined at compile time?
then we could have something like
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so ->
/usr/lib64/all-browser-plugins/libpepflashplayer.so
/usr/lib64/chromium/libwidevinecdmadapter.so ->
/usr/lib64/all-browser-plugins/libwidevinecdmadapter.so
which would make also packaging the plugins kinda easier, right?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>