<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286#c20">Comment # 20</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin"
href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286">bug 4286</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sergio@serjux.com" title="Sérgio Basto <sergio@serjux.com>"> <span class="fn">Sérgio Basto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Kevin Kofler from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=4286#c19">comment #19</a>)
<span class="quote">> If you want to offer users a real RPM without LPF, the repository you are
> currently shipping the package in is really the only way to go (as they
> don't seem to care about license compliance at all, unlike RPM Fusion).</span >
you mean unitedrpms ? flash_player_ppapi_linux.x86_64.tar.gz got an LGPLv3
license , can you you comment if is distributable or not ? please .</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>