<p dir="ltr">In fedora I am always build release for all supported versions (for example f23, f24, f25, rawhide now) if it possible. And can solve build problems on early development stage.</p>
<p dir="ltr">It help find roblems not only in my package but in all BuildRequires. Also package builded with latest available BR versions that may have solve some warnings or has new features.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I am think it is good for most packages.</p>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">вт, 18 окт. 2016 г., 22:05 Nicolas Chauvet <<a href="mailto:kwizart@gmail.com">kwizart@gmail.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">2016-10-18 21:03 GMT+02:00 Vascom <<a href="mailto:vascom2@gmail.com" class="gmail_msg" target="_blank">vascom2@gmail.com</a>>:<br class="gmail_msg">
>> F25 don't had one mass rebuild , so it is normal have fc24 suffixes in<br class="gmail_msg">
>> f25 and rawhide (f26)<br class="gmail_msg">
><br class="gmail_msg">
> Why not build same version with fresh gcc and other devel package?<br class="gmail_msg">
You can have the same question in fedora, you will have a equivalent<br class="gmail_msg">
answer as us.<br class="gmail_msg">
<br class="gmail_msg">
Thx<br class="gmail_msg">
<br class="gmail_msg">
<br class="gmail_msg">
--<br class="gmail_msg">
-<br class="gmail_msg">
<br class="gmail_msg">
Nicolas (kwizart)<br class="gmail_msg">
</blockquote></div>