nvidia 304.64

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Wed Apr 24 15:23:24 CEST 2013


On Qua, 2013-04-24 at 10:47 +0100, John Pilkington wrote: 
> On 24/04/13 10:30, John Pilkington wrote:
> >
> >>>> nvidia-xconfig showing as updated to 304.60 but ok. I don't think I
> >>>> have
> >>>> any relevant ATrpms packages installed now, and the URL shows that
> >>>> 304.64 has given other people trouble.
> >>>
> >>> repoquery --envra --releasever=17 \*nvidia\*
> >>> --disablerepo=free-fedora-update-testing
> >>>
> >>> you have
> >>> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304.88-1.fc17.x86_64
> >>> and
> >>> nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc17.x86_64
> >
> > Yes, but 304.88 is in nonfree-update-testing, so your test still sees it.
> >
> > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/17/x86_64/kmod-nvidia-304.88-1.fc17.3.x86_64.rpm
> >
> >      19-Apr-2013 11:04     38K
> >
> > Anyway, I have installed it and all seems ok.  xorg.conf remains as it
> > was after my edit, so the nvidia modules are being loaded and it works,
> > at least for me.
> >
> > It's probably not worth making changes to the 304.64 packages now, since
> > they will presumably soon disappear and this thread is in the archive. I
> > was just trying to make several simultaneous major changes to my system
> > and a broken graphics driver didn't help.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > John P
> >
> And I see that /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-nvidia.conf,  provided by 
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia,
> has the same intended effect as my edit to xorg.conf; it just looks as 
> if xorg.conf had precedence.

yes now xorg could be configured in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ so with
00-nvidia.conf 
xorg.conf should only have 
drive nvidia section. 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.


More information about the rpmfusion-users mailing list