librtmp soname bump?!

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2014/1/6 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>

> should i rebuild my packages against
> librtmp-2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20.x86_64
> or will this soname-breakage reverted?
>
> [root at srv-rhsoft:~]$ yum upgrade
> Loaded plugins: etckeeper, protectbase, tsflags
> rhsoft-fedora
>                               | 2.9 kB
> 00:00:00
> rhsoft-generic
>                              | 2.9 kB
> 00:00:00
> 0 packages excluded due to repository protections
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19 will be
> updated
> --> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> ffmpeg-compat-0.6.7-3.fc20.x86_64
> ---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20 will be an
> update
> ---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-2.fc20 will be updated
> ---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-3.fc20 will be an update
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies
> Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies
> Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64 (installed)
>

This is not our ffmpeg package, the librtpm was disabled there on purpose.

That been said, others packages are affected by the librtpm bump and there
is indeed a rebuilt been done.
I will push the packages ASAP. This is coordinated by the maintainer.

Nicolas (kwizart)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/attachments/20140107/2074e021/attachment.html>