what about soname bumps and rebuilds

[Reindl Harald]

Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Fedora 23
>>
>> * x264 so 148
>> * avidemux requires so 142
>> * the gstreamer ugly requires so 142
>>
>> why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264
>> without take care of rebuild depending packages?
>>
>
> Where you got x264 so 148 ?

rpmfusion testing most likely?

> it happens , hold your breath please

for how long?

6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt
normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all

[root at rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/attachments/20151102/a7767d70/attachment.sig>