what about soname bumps and rebuilds

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2015-11-10 at 12:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.11.2015 um 12:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Ter, 2015-11-10 at 11:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 02.11.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> >>> Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> >>>> On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>>>> Fedora 23
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * x264 so 148
> >>>>> * avidemux requires so 142
> >>>>> * the gstreamer ugly requires so 142
> >>>>>
> >>>>> why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264
> >>>>> without take care of rebuild depending packages?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Where you got x264 so 148 ?
> >>>
> >>> rpmfusion testing most likely?
> >>>
> >>>> it happens , hold your breath please
> >>>
> >>> for how long?
> >>>
> >>> 6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt
> >>> normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all
> >>>
> >>> [root at rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148
> >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148
> >>
> >> congratulations, avidemux dependencies are now broken in stable updates
> >> too even for Fedora 21
> >>
> >> F21:
> >> Error: Package: avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc21.x86_64
> >> (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit)
> >>
> >> F23:
> >> nothing provides libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) needed by
> >> avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64
> >> nothing provides libx264.so.142 needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.i686
> >>
> >> thanks god it can't solve i686 deps on a pure x86_64 machine where
> >> dnf/yum tries to fallback because the unsolveable deps....
> >
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3815
> 
> fine, don't apply to gstreamer ugly and honestly i don't understand why 
> developers / maintainers not install their own dogfood to find out such 
> major breaks weeks ago or just don't bump so-names shortly befor the 
> Fedora version goes goldReindl Harald

You should understand that you are not helping with this kind of
comments , you are lucky have packages of RPMFusion for F23 , what  do
you mean by "don't apply to gstreamer ugly" ?  , developers /
maintainers don't have the access to infra, they can't commit anywhere,
because infra still being build , and noone knows how it will end. 
where is the bug report ? 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.