Update to f24: Error: Package xxxxx.rpm is not signed

[Sérgio Basto]

you may use --nogpgcheck
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade#Does_DNF_system_upgrade_verify_the_software_it_runs_or_installs_during_upgrade.3F

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com> wrote:

> After the upgrade to F23 I'm going to wait until rpmfusion is happy
> with their packages before going to F24.
>
> I find it rather necessary!
>
> regards Dave P
>
>
> On 22 June 2016 at 10:53, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> > On 21/06/16 16:10, Dario Lesca wrote:
> >>
> >> I run this command on my f23:
> >>
> >>> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=24 --allowerasing -y
> >>
> >>
> >> After 3,2 Gb of download I have get this error:
> >>
> >>> ...
> >>>  freetype                       i686   2.6.3-2.fc24
>  fedora
> >>> 366 k
> >>>  freetype                       x86_64 2.6.3-2.fc24
>  fedora
> >>> 360 k
> >>>  freetype-devel                 x86_64 2.6.3-2.fc24
>  fedora
> >>> 447 k
> >>>  freetype-freeworld             x86_64 2.5.5-2.fc24
> >>> rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> >>> ...
> >>> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
> >>> transaction.
> >>> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
> >>> Error: Package freetype-freeworld-2.5.5-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> >>
> >>
> >> Some suggest?
> >
> >
> > Looks like some (maybe all?) of the fc24 packages are not signed.
> >
> > Got this this morning when updating my F24 box:
> >
> > Error: Package rpmfusion-free-release-24-0.1.noarch.rpm is not signed
> >
> > I currently have rpmfusion-free-release-23-0.1.noarch installed.
> >
> > Paul.
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/attachments/20160622/03e4506f/attachment.html>