Branching for F-10

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Sat Nov 8 11:42:12 CET 2008


On 08.11.2008 11:21, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
>> On 08.11.2008 00:13, Xavier Lamien wrote:
>>> Author: laxathom
>>>
>>> Update of /cvs/nonfree/CVSROOT
>>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/tmps27459/modules
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>>        modules Log Message:
>>> Added new branch F-10 for module: xv
>> Hmmm. Do we really want to branching packages for F-10?
> Yeah, this can be easily done and stay transparent for contributors.

But where is the benefit? And how do you prevent that somebody over the 
next 18 days buikds something in the F-10 branch and forgets to update 
the devel branch?

I'd say the ideal point for us to branch packages is when the builders 
and the push scripts are actually updated and configured to build 
against a different set of packages (e.g. when we have a F-10 repos and 
before rawhide moves on). Before that there is no benefit.

 > [...]
>>  * We have no place where the push scripts could push F-11 packages to
> The place will be available once f10 will come out.

Sure it will, but afaics branching now just creates confusion. But 
whatever, I don't care much, if you really think it makes sense go ahead.

CU
knurd


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list