Next steps to get RPM Fusion running

Xavier Lamien laxathom at fedoraproject.org
Sun Sep 14 20:46:00 CEST 2008


On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> just thought I write down a rough list of things that I plan to do for RPM
> Fusion over the next couple of weeks. I'm sending it here in the hope that
> some people help me with some of those task; then we hopefully get RPM
> Fusion running quite soon.
>
> = most important things =
>
> - get the mini-mirrormanager from
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40#c9
> installed and running somewhere. Xavier afaik is ready with that for a few
> days now; but he needs thias to get the machine in DNS, as only he has
> control over DNS and thus is the only one that can add mirror.rpmfusion.org;
> once that is done get the rpmfusion-release package into the repos
>
> - we need a decision for kernel-module packaging. Decision here mainly
> means: Get a statement (preferred a ACK) from thias regarding kmods (which
> includes akmods), which afaics most of the other crucial packagers accepted
> (Hans, Dominik and a few others)
>
> - once those two things are finished and the release-package is known to be
> working I'll add rpmfusion-{non,}free-release to the livna *devel* repos;
> then I'll build a new livna-release package that has a hard dep on those
> two.
>
>  Livna-devel users thus will get rpmfusion enabled *automatically*. Some
> people will not like it, but it's a reasonable things to do IMHO. Especially
> as I plan to stop updating the livna devel repo from that point (one things
> less to take care of for me and the package maintainers).
>
>  If that works out fine I plan to do the same for Fedora {8,9}-testing a few
> days later.
>
>
> = other important things =
>
> - get the remaining packages from dribble and livna into the repo; latest
> status can be found here:
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-September/001073.html
>
>  Anybody can help with this -- pick a package, poke the maintainer directly
> via mail or irc; if he doesn't react at all for a few days consider to take
> a closer look at the package and its problem; if you can make it work send
> me a patch and I'll apply it to CVS and queue the build.
>
> - check that the upgrade path from Livna -> RPM Fusion is sane for each
> package in each of the supported Fedora releases
>
> - start importing and building the remaining packages from freshrpms; I can
> do that, but I want to get the ACK from thias first; especially as
> http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge likely is not fully up to date
>
> - get the dep checker script from Fedora Extras/EPEL (
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/extras-repoclosure/?root=fedora  ) in
> place and let it automatically run after each successful push; if possible
> without to much work get upgradecheck (
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/upgradecheck/?root=fedora ) running as
> well.
>

I already started work on that part, it will be ready for the next
couple of days.

> = not that important =
>
> - in parallel to all the above: work further on getting the crucial packages
> into the EL repo for RPM Fusion (
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-September/000991.html
> ). Libmp4v2 (needed by faad2) is blocking that work right now; libmp4v2 is
> in Fedora and EPEL4, but not build for EPEL5 yet. Don't know why; wrote
> thias (who maintains libmp4v2 in Fedora and EPEL) a mail about it a week
> ago, no answer yet :-/
>

Check

> = End =
>
> That round about it from the top of my head. Did I miss anything? Likely,
> but I think I'm optimistic that I got the most important things on the list
> :-)
>
> Cu
> knurd
>



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list