[Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video
editors, media players, transcoders
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri May 8 23:45:17 CEST 2009
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #62 from Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar at gmail.com> 2009-05-08 23:45:16 ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> Dear Zarko and Orcan,
>
> I am sorry if my comments offended you. It may be known to some that I am not
> particularly fond of some Fedora policies. However, I have also expressed that
> I do respect the good intention and effort of the Fedora project. The goal here
> is to make kdenlive, which is receiving praises, readily available to Fedora
> users. Allow me to propose that we not let us not let our emotions from
I accept your apology, and I hope that it will accept and Orcan.
I'm always on the user's side and it is not good that users suffer because of
this.
So, if Orcan agree with me, I want to continue work on packaking MLT and
Kdenlive.
BTW, my idea is to primary concentrate to:
1) Calling exit() in a shared lib.
2) Strange, mixed license comments in mlt++ source.
3) unused-direct-shlib-dependency (libmlt linking to libm) and plugins
and secondary to:
4) "A segfault is always a bug."
Because F11 do not have Segfaults issue, but have 1), 2) and 3), and my opinion
is builds primary for F11, and than for F10 branch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list