Why are akmod packages arch specific?

Stewart Adam maillist at diffingo.com
Sat Apr 24 21:56:40 CEST 2010


On 2010/04/24 8:16 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months
> ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a
> separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define
> buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly
> is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the
> one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in
> the repos.
>
> The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when
> integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the
> foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip
> a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager,
> but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone.
>
> Opinions?
+1. I think this is more intuitive and copying the spec if not a big deal 
anyways - just 'cvs diff -u' then 'patch < /path/to/diff' wherever needed.

Stewart


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list