Workaround of some buildroot failure and ffmpeg

[Ben Rosser]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> - rfpkg needs to be removed from the default buildroot and use
>>> rfpkg-minimal instead.
>>> This is a simple task that anyone can take. (convert and create
>>> rfpkg-minimal rpm package based on fedpkg-minimal)
>>>
>>
>> I just took a look at this, since it sounded like something I might be
>> able to do. fedpkg-minimal is pretty straightforward:
>> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/bin/fedpkg
>>
>> Unfortunately, an RPM Fusion equivalent will need to know whether or not
>> the package in question is in free/ or in nonfree/, because of the dist-git
>> namespacing. e.g. the curl line should become
>> "$baseurl/free/$pkgname/$tarball/$md5sum/$tarball" or
>> "$baseurl/nonfree/$pkgname/$tarball/$md5sum/$tarball". Assuming I'm not
>> missing something obvious, I can think of three ways to deal with this:
>>
>> a. Provide rfpkg-free and rfpkg-nonfree scripts, one for each namespace.
>>
>> b. Attempt to download both and ignore failures (curl ... || true?), then
>> check to see if the file exists before proceeding.
>>
>> c. Somehow determine whether a package is in free/ or nonfree/ at
>> runtime. This would be the optimal solution but I'm not sure if there's a
>> good way to do it. Perhaps checking .git/config for a configured remote
>> with URL containing "free" or "nonfree"?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ben Rosser
>>
>
>
> I ended up implementing (c) *and* (b); rfpkg-minimal attempts to read
> .git/config and then just tries to download from both if it is not there. I
> forked the fedpkg-minimal git repo and pushed to github here:
> https://github.com/TC01/rfpkg-minimal
>
> If this looks good, I'm happy to throw together a spec and submit a
> package for review.
>
> Ben Rosser
>

Well, preliminary review request opened, since I figured I might as well
throw together a spec file too:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112.

Ben Rosser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20160707/1e5efdfe/attachment.html>