Package assignment

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-03-01 at 18:57 +0100, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Sérgio Basto:
> > 
> > Well bugzilla have good tools to search and you can save the
> > searches.
> Sure, but if possible I prefer to get an interrupt when things
> happen,
> rather than having to poll. :-)
> 
> > 
> > Last but not least, do you approve the update (as the maintainer of
> > the
> > package) ? 
> > https://github.com/rpmfusion/mythtv-status/commit/b51e05c76bcb2ad82
> > e3c0
> > 787d5bc4d53a931d674
> Reading a patch of a patch was an interesting experience.  :-)

you may read final result :  
https://github.com/rpmfusion/mythtv-status/blob/master/mythtv-status.spec

> Overall, it looks fine.  I have two comments:
> 
> 1. The comment "Add mythtv status to end of stub" in
> mythtv-update-motd that previously existed in the patch could have
> been left in.  No big deal, though.
> 
> 2. Why is it necessary to throw away standard error of the
> mythtv-status command in mythtv-update-motd?  It isn't new in this
> version, but the line is modified so I noted.  (Maybe that is more a
> question for Susi Lehtola.  Cc:ing explicitly in case no longer a
> subscriber.)

Can you fork git at github.com:rpmfusion/mythtv-status.git and do a pull
request? please.

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.