libdvdcss merger

[Hans de Goede]

Richi Plana wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as both 
>> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel 
>> package which should be removed.
> 
> Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate
> package? And is this an rpmfusion policy?

No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a 
rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora 
policies.

Regards,

Hans